There are basically two methods for the falsification of history. One iof them is to keep silent on certain aspects of history, and the other one is to start the history of certain things from a particular date and forget about the background.

The book of the famous French historian (in Defence History) was published in Hungarian but the chapter on the Hungarian conquest and our first king Stephen I. were omitted by the editor Domokos Kosáry in 1974. It is nevertheless useful to see how Western historians view the early Hungarians.

The center-left Hungarian daily and weekly papers responded to the anti-American terrorist attacks from a variety of angles – ethnic imperialism, liberal fundamentalism, great power realism, postmodenism, liberal multilateralism and social-democratic structuralism. The impact of these ideologies on leader articles and commentaries is assessed.

The 1919 events are typical examples of how our histoty is re-interpreted and misinterpreted by some authors. The better case is when the former "red tail" is replaced by a "civic tail" but there are examples that mirror the bias of the very partisan times of the early 1950s.

Four comments on the global situation arising from the attack against New York and Washington (written between September  15 and October  15, 2001)