on Gyorgy Rozsa: Anti-equilibrium – Discussion paper on the equal chances of developing countries Argumentum 2004

One of the reasons behind the differences between the rich and poor countries is colonisation. The three imaginary manifestos analyses the consequences of colonisation (massive starvation, danger of terrorism) from different points of view.

Table of contents

1. Fenyő D. György, Kertész Ákos, Kállai R. Gábor, Tverdota György, Szívós Mihály, Agárdi Péter, Mező Ferenc : Attila Jozsef 2003
2. Max Fraad-Wolff, Richard D. Wolff : Flexible economy tough reality
3. Endreffy Zoltán : Neoliberalism and globalisation
4. Stephen Eric Bonner : US filed study, or lies, fear and forcing democracy
5. Wiener György : Contribution to the state socialsm debate
6. Ana Bazac : Anti-stalinist dissidents and the “vox intelligent(s)iae”
7. André Tosel : The old Lukacs and the Budapest School
8. Malise Ruthven : Edward W. Said (1935-2003) and his Orientalizm
9. Edward W. Said : Humanism is the only protection against barbarism
10. Farkas Miklós : Malthus after 200 years
11. Kertész Ákos : Magic words (swears – shocking the public – literature)
12. Bereti Gábor : State of affairs and vision on future, Social Forum in Miskolc 5-6 April 2003
13. Shalini Randeria : Parable about the neem tree – The transnationalisation of law and the role of NGO actors
14. Ravi Arvand Palat : Is India part of Asia?
15. Roland Pierre Paringaux : Food self-provision is in threat. Will the Indian agriculture survive the WTO test?
16. Kumkum Sangari : Ways of violence
17. Kammunist Kranti : A ballad against work

According to this critical analysis, the EU has reached a point with its compromises and its pressure on the candidate countries, where the unchanged continuation of the present policies would endanger the results of the ongoing integration and push the process into a deadlock. Hungarian economic policy also cannot be shaped without taking this fact into consideration.

The so far biggest socialist experiment has failed, but the challenge that created it is still valid and relevant. What is more, in the age of new capitalism, the "temptation" to reflect on the social problems bearing this challenge has become stronger than ever.