Round table discussion about privatisation, the possibilities of workers' ownership. The participants of the discussion are the manager who wants to have an increasing scope of activities, the banking expert who defends monetary interference and an apostle of whe workers' ownership. The discussion is at the same time the presentation of three different concepts of socialism: one, which wants to refine capitalisation with welfare mechanisms preventing impoverishment, two, which accepts the turn towards capitalism as something bad, which however, is a necessary precondition of true socialism and three, which wants to present elements of post-capitalist economy and social organisation with workers'ownership.
Category Archives: Former issues
No. 4 | (Winter 1989)
Table of contents
- Szabó András György : Marx and state socialism – Louis Blanc-Rodbertus-Lassalle-Hyndman
- Krausz Tamás : The Mensheviks and socialism – in the light of documents
- Urban Herlitz : Trends of social devlopment and socialism
- Szigeti Péter : Capitalism – late capitalism (lessons from a study)
- Theses of the Menshevik party (10 April 1920)
- Porosz Tibor : Theses about Stalinism
- Slemmer László : An age of humanistic capital?
- Tütő László : A serving state and a “freely floating” government
- Liberalism
- Worker
- Saul Landau : The masters of all we know
- alfa : Remarks to a book
- Kapitány Ágnes, Kapitány Gábor : Where do you go Eastern Europe?
During the National Round Table dicussions
In this conversation with some of the participants of the talks, one can read about the endeavours represented by the negotiating sides and the tactics of negotiation serving those goals.
My mother’s question
This is a testimony of the value of a document about Stalinism by a one time camp inmate philosopher. The writing reflects a whole historical period and the world of emotions and way of seeing of a whole generation.