Nothing is more present as the past, thus the question "does Auschwitz exist as aesthetic?" is a real oxymoron. It may exist, because three is no such aspect of culture, which is not a document of barbarism as well – as it is shown in the Auschwitz Album annoyingly. But if Auschwitz is the absolute new, the impossible what happened, then how this document on the impossible is possible?

The late Rudolf Meidnert, who passed away just last December, was known as one of the fathers of the "Swedish model". With his economist colleagues he developed a model based on centralised wage negotiations and a solidarity wage system, which enabled them simultaneously achieve both high employment level and low inflation. Meidner's most foresighted idea was the program of gradually transferring corporate shares to employees, but not even the social democratic government was ready.

Representatives of the progression must find a new strategy in the world of modernity, lacking any centres. According to the author Derrida's postmodernism can be a reference point in finding a non static non-metaphysic way to the solution. What Zapatistas try by their "caracoles" strategy.

Anti-Leninist anti-capitalism is a philosophical oxymoron, but it is nonetheless an existing and potent intellectual standpoint in "Anglo-Saxon political Marxism" – which has seen better days – and also elsewhere. It rejects some historical facts and developments with theoretical verve, thus barring the way for deep and comprehensive analysis of social developments.