The author starts out from power violence and opposes it to anti-power and therefore anti-violence anarchy. He describes the trends of anarchism, the means used by anarchists, their debates about the use of violence and the terrorist age of anarchy. According to his standpoint, to a large extent, the violent solutions can be traced back to the moral characteristics of one or another movement. He argues that anarchy is the least violent of the various emancipation movements.

The author-sociologist analyses the whys and hows of getting into the forefront of the cult of violence, national intolerance and elements of fascist ideology of the attitude of young generations in the 1980s. He traces back partly psychological motivations, partly the hopelessness of the social position when discussing the emergence of these phenomena that can be identified with conscious fascism only very rarely and by taking abundant quotations from young people's ideals, he shows the specific features of thinking of this marginal group.

about self-government in residential communities, about the relationship between the self-government movement and the federation organised from above, and about the possibilities of self-governments.

Seeking the new image of the left wing movement, the authors argue that – in contrast to the traditions – the acceptance of violence has to be excluded from it. They list the onthological elements of violence and the main social mechanisms that produce violence. They establish a relationship between the theory of revolutionary violence and the idealisation of the working class and finally discuss the possibility of linking the absence of violence and a revolutionary attitude towards society.