Category Archives: Periodical

No. 92 | (Winter 2011)

Topics of the articles of this issue vary considerably but almost all of them are common in dealing with the fundamental contradictions of the capital system and capitalism, which are undermining the framework of human life. From Holocaust to the global crisis, the reader can find thorough analyses on the chances of escaping by social production as well as on cultural resistance. The debate on the world-systems analysis of Wallerstein is also continued. A series of photos, as a new feature of Eszmélet, present the artwork of Éva Keleti. We recommend reading on Auschwitz, the ghetto, defaulting states and the world system, economic collapse, Beatles, global crisis, postcoloniality and on escaping the grip of the state and capital.
Table of contents
  1. Farkas Péter : On the sources of the world system analysis
  2. Wiener György : The approach to history in the world-systems analysis of Wallerstein
  3. Vígh László : Why capitalism is a world-system or why the world-system is capitalist?
  4. Ramón Grosfoguel : Transmodernity, border thinking, and global coloniality – Decolonizing political economy and postcolonial studies
  5. Benedek Szabolcs : Apocryphal Beatles
  6. Jürgen Kocka : History and the social sciences today
  7. Aron Shneer : Holocaust and genocide – What is general and what is specific?
  8. Frey Dóra : The Auschwitz Protocols – A still little known historical document
  9. Csonka Laura : Ghettos in the occupied area of the Soviet Union
  10. Maciej Melon : The way of Poland established an ethnically homogenous nation state – remarks to the “Golden Mine” by Jan T. Gross
  11. Fodor Gábor : The extermination of Armenians in Turkey during World War I
  12. Tütő László : Default Movement
  13. Szarka Klára : Éva Keleti – a flashback

Thoughts about the system based approach, interpreting systems and system changes

"There was no way for me to disagree, and I still fully agree that the world economy should be interpreted as an organic system, which produces uneven and even polarising development, since I myself also explained the gap in international development in the context of the historic development of the world economy. But there was no way for me not to criticise the absolute and exclusive interpretation of the world systems analysis of Wallerstein […] and the explanation of the emergence of the capitalist market economy by a historic accident: by a certain unlash of the creative forces of the ruling elite, […] or rooting unequal exchange in monopolisation and making it the main form of international exploitation, and the idea that running out pre-capitalist reserves will finally limit the global accumulation of capital."

The world-systems theory: arguments and problems

The author looks at the world-systems analysis as a recent, up-to-date and adequate form of the Marx rooted critical social theory – contrary to Wallerstein himself, who regards his attempts as establishing a new and interdisciplinary science, although in its direct factors of emergence giving credits to elements of the Marxian tradition. The world-systems analysis, nevertheless offers a fruitful and rich insight, with several players, which can be tested against reality.

A no-bush has no flower

In its critique, the essay points out the wrong approach of the theory by Wallerstein, illustrating it by the example of looking at the causes of falling profit rates, making the critique practical. According to the author, Wallerstein over emphasizes the role of cognitive factors by analysing world systems separately. It dissolves human history as it is and by neglecting the labour theory of value it does not provide a valid and practical solution for explaining falling profit rates.