Category Archives: Periodical

No. 2 | (Summer 1989)

Table of contents
  1. Kapitány Ágnes, Kapitány Gábor : The split left wing – ethnic character, Marxism, anarchism and self-government
  2. Tütő László, Juhász Pál, Lengyel László, Varga Csaba, Kapitány Gábor : Round table discussion on self-government
  3. Harsányi Iván : Self-government in the fighting Spanish Republic (1936-1939) From documents of collectivisation in Catalonia and Aragon
  4. Feitl István : The Hungarian workers’ councils and self-government in 1956
  5. Felix Damette : Transformation, management – the issue of self-government (excerpts)
  6. Factory constitution and workers’ self-government in the FRG
  7. Harris Collingwood, John Hoerr : We are not going to sit around and allow the company management to waste things
  8. Havas Ferenc : Excerpts from the programme of the West German Greens
  9. Borisz Kagarlickij : The dialectics of change – The Soviet new left
  10. Marton Imre : Traps of history
  11. Statement by the National Association of Council Self-Governments
  12. The Self-Government Movement
  13. Exploitation
  14. Social ownership
  15. Market economy

The split left wing – ethnic character, Marxism, anarchism and self-government

The article is about the common root of the various leftwing trends and some of the causes why they became separated and opposed to one another. Starting out from the crisis of the left wing, it sees the way out in a new synthesis of the left. However, the supporters of such a synthesis cannot avoid the question of what the common denominator of these new trends could be. The authors of the article see self-government as one of the possible common denominators.

Round table discussion on self-government

When thinking about the idea of self-government, first we have to determine what we mean by this category. The participants of the discussion – a member of the council of the Alliance of Free Democrats, one of the most interesting figures of contemporary Hungarian economics, a founding member of BAL (Left Alternative) and a leader of Néppárt (People's Party) – first analyse how they interpret self-government and then outline their arguments for and against it. They try to determine the sphere where the principle of self-government can be applied, as well as its conditions and limitations. The round table discussion will continue in the next issue of the periodica.

Self-government in the fighting Spanish Republic (1936-1939) From documents of collectivisation in Catalonia and Aragon

The author analyzes the rural self-governments led by anarchists that existed for a relatively long period of time during the Spanish civil war, interpreting the given historical situation of the 1930s and confronting it with the present conditions. In the appendix, there is the resolution adopted at the peasant congress on the collectivization of the land.

What this journal wants?

Today, when it is very fashionable to establish new journals, why do we need one more? After the rejection of our initiative five years ago, why did we consider it necessary to make a new try in 1988?

Because in spite of the proliferating new publications and periodicals we still miss the one, which represents the school and thought with which the founders of this journal identify.

What does this journal want, after all? What justifies the foundation of this new periodical?

This is a leftist journal, whose editors are convinced that the events of the past decades have got little to do with Marxism if we bracket the hypocritical slogans and, more regrettably, the faith of many people. Therefore the past cannot refute the validity of Marxist principles. The editors of this new journal believe that it pays to live in accordance with these principles but we have to start from the beginning and we have to follow a totally different path than what was taken by the movement, which was organized along the principles of Marxism, in the past 100 years. Consequently the journal intends to participate in the destruction of the established structures but it also seeks to oppose the processes, which Marx characterized as "the reproduction of the old trash" when speaking of the foreseeable failure of the society, which levels people on the basis of poverty.

Our journal principally opposes any inequality in power and any privilege regardless of whether inequality originates in economic power or the hierarchy of state administration. It is on the side of the subordinated, the exploited and the needy but it does not accept a leveling, which degrades everybody to a uniform state of subordination and poverty but its ideal is a world where everybody can have a share in everything that human efforts create. It seeks for the future in the name of the thousand-year-old longing for real freedom and equality. In the present it likewise refuses the compromises of the various (economic, power, intellectual) elite groups that they make with the exclusion of the masses, who constitute the majority of society. It holds that it is unavoidable and absolutely necessary to involve every member of society in decisions, which affect their lives. It holds that it is important to unite all progressive forces in Hungary, in Eastern Europe and in the world, which seek to render human life more human.

The journal aims to pursue these general goals firstly by means of theoretical analyses. We are trying to map the present opportunities of the left in the world and in Hungary; to interpret the ongoing economic, political, social structural and intellectual-cultural processes; and to introduce and evaluate from the perspective of the left the events of the past decades in the light of historical documents primarily in the countries, which called themselves socialist, and in the leftist movements with an emphasis on the positive tendencies, which were not but could have been carried further.

As for the present we would like to introduce the various forms of struggles against social injustices. Our column, which is dedicated to the various initiatives, methods and events of the trade union movements of the world, intends to promote the safeguarding of workers' interests.

Next to workers' solidarity our priority is to support social self-organization and the establishment of self-governments, which are organized along various interests, or co-ordinate working or living communities. By introducing such initiatives we are trying to promote the process through which the members of society can indeed take their fate in their hand.

Out of the program proposals of the various alternative organizations we publish those, which in our opinion can increase social justice independently of the character of the whole program.

And last but not least we would like to relate all the above to the development of the international leftist thought: we intend to publish articles by thinkers all over the world so that we could confront their thoughts and ideas with each other and the social phenomena that they want to describe.

*

Our journal admittedly represents a school. We think that the decade-long practice of editing journals in Hungary, the simple juxtaposition of totally different viewpoints ("on the one hand – on the other hand") is nothing else but a return to the principle of "divide et impera" and a refusal to think seriously and sincerely. We publish only the articles, which in our opinion can facilitate the realization of our goals listed above. This, however, does not mean homogenization: a sensible purpose can always unite various energies coming from different sources.

We are consequently fighting against any form of social injustices but we do not want to fight this battle in the manner of a tavern brawl. We are trying to give arguments to the efforts of those who oppose both the currently triumphant advance of capitalism and the dictatorial mechanisms, which discredited the idea of people's power. But we definitely reject any rude, demagogical and extremist writing because we believe that by defaming enemies we are defaming ourselves. We cannot fight for humanistic goals by giving up humanity; we have the right to speak of social justice only as long as we respect humanity in everybody, including our enemies.

Eventually and most importantly, the mission of our journal is a quest. It seeks for the new arguments, new purposes, a new face and a new voice of the left; for the sources and opportunities of its new advance. We are on a quest. We are inviting the Reader to join us in this quest.

To the title

It is not the first time that this word borrowed from the poet Attila József appears in the history of Hungarian journals. István Mészáros wrote of the antecedents, which seemed to be the most significant at the time in the first, immigrant issue of "Eszmélet", which he published in England (Christ Church, Oxford, October 1958): „The foundation of ESZMÉLET was one of the most important results of the national unity in the Hungarian intellectual life, which was achieved during 1955-56. Its editorial board consisted of Aurél Bernáth, Tibor Déry, Gyula Illyés, Zoltán Kodály and George Lukács. It was the first time that we witnessed such wide-scale and really ideological union in Hungary. The editorial board started its work in the summer of 1956 and it appointed István Mészáros as editor-in-chief of the journal. After months of wrangling and fighting the highest power organs eventually permitted the publication of ESZMÉLET (…)." The events of 1956, however, prevented the publication of the journal in Hungary; István Mészáros published two issues after his immigration to England.

At the end of the 1960s and in the beginning of the 1970s Béla Horgas tried to establish a journal under the same title, which intended to mobilize the most progressive forces of the Hungarian intellectual life, who sought for progress in different forms according to the new circumstances. This was, however, an unsuccessful attempt because of the resistance of contemporary cultural politicians. The students of the Faculty of Teacher Training of ELTE (Eötvös Loránd University of Budapest) have recently published a journal under this title at the university.

We thank for their agreement to launch our journal under the title which they have (also) chosen.

(translated by Eszter Bartha)