Interpreting modernity as consulting practices to cope with the perpetual change deriving from the capitalist imperative to ceaseless accumulation, it is argued that world hegemonic states create exceptional periods of change which stimulate major constructions of modernity. The nature of these modernities is explored through the creative arts where the hegemon's civil society has been a cultural as well as an economic leader.

By our times, the liberal-social democratic project of emancipation has been exhausted. The modernisation of male-female relation is under way, although this is now related to teh process of commercialisation. The latter has a differentiated impact on certain groups of women.

Can the figure of the sambista be a Brazilian form of what Antonio Gramsci called "socialist bodies"? Is there a "political manifest" in the figure of the sambistas? If this so, how does the sambista represent an organism, which Gramsci called "political party"?

According to the author, the catching-up models of certain Third World countries focusing on industrialisation cannot be applied in Eastern Europe because in this region the national economies have been industrialised. The adjustment to Europe requires dynamic economic development though in practice both capital importing and capital accumulation strategies have to face a number of obstacles.