Category Archives: Periodical

No. 8 | (Winter 1990)

Table of contents
  1. Marosán György, Mocsáry József, Angyal Ádám, Krausz Tamás : Who should be the owner?
  2. Without alternatives. Introduction: Why the “Russian model” is important?
  3. V. P. Buldakov : The October Revolution as socio-cultural phenomenon
  4. Nagy Péter Tibor : Adaptation of the October Revolution and the Soviet Union in the counter-revolutionary Hungary
  5. Statement of the United Opposition
  6. V. Lepehin : Do we know where we are heading? Review of the Soviet Union’s current political movements
  7. Statistics about the Soviet Union
  8. Szénási Sándor : The “two souls” of bolshevism – Interview with Ákos Szilágyi
  9. Immanuel Wallerstein : About the socialist experiment in the 20th century
  10. Samuel Bowles : Events in Eastern Europe could revitalize leftist scholarship
  11. M. M. : Who is defended by the iron curtain?
  12. Sz. Bíró Zoltán : Selected bibliography proposed to the history of the “Russian model”
  13. Krausz Tamás : The actuality of Berdaiev
  14. Daniel Singer : István Mészáros: The power of ideology
  15. Kapitány Ágnes, Marton Imre, Kapitány Gábor : Conversation with Gilbert Wasserman chief editor of M
  16. The struggle of parties paid by workers or what we should know about the Federation of the Poor and Helpless
  17. Tót Éva : An interview about the life of Sándor Szili

The revolution just like Saturn eats up its own sons – Buchner on the mithology of revolution

It is an analysis of Buchner's Danton-drama. The article traces back the rather controversial presentation of the revolution in the play to Buüchner's experiences as a second generation revolutionary. According to the author, the contradictory nature of the revolution is also expressed in the way how the myth of the revolution and the absurd outlook on the world confront in the play.

The role of force in pedagogy

The well known pedagogue-author discusses the problems linked with applying compulsion of education. At a certain level, compulsion goes together with all types of pedagogy. In contrast to education based on force and the extremities of liberal attitudes, he is supporter of an individual-centred education in which the individual is viewed in his active mutual relationship with society and where compulsion, the force of the community emerges as a result of the activity of individuals forming the community: the individual can act as subject of his own education.

March and revolution

The short essay proves the bourgeoise nature of the march songs which are linked with the working class movement in public thinking, namely that aggressive subordination of individuals to being a mass of people contradicts socialist endeavours aimed at developing individuality.